Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracx

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for this small company. All iformation about its possible importance is derived from it's own PR.. The only tsource that might "possibly" be independent is ref 5. DGG ( talk ) 18:36, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:CORP. I have also independently reviewed available references and in concurrence with DGGs statement, most of the references are re-publications of the subject company's own press releases. The aforementioned ref 5 is fairly brief and is not a great deal of coverage to justify notability for this corp. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 18:51, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This company is not notable. Plaintive plaintiff (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Agreed that ref 5 constitutes a brief mention. There looks to be an independent review of the Tracx system in the book How to Measure Social Media: A Step-By-Step Guide to Developing and Assessing Social Media ROI and there is a patent application, but not much is mentioned about the company. At present it looks like the software may eventually become notable, but I see little evidence for notability of the company. Mark viking (talk) 21:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.